In partnership with
FROM OUR PARTNER
10 Stocks at the Center of AI’s $1 Trillion Boom
AI’s growth story is much bigger than chatbots.
The market was already valued at an estimated $800 billion by late 2025, and continued adoption could push it beyond $1 trillion in the years ahead. That growth will require more data centers, computing power, software, networking and intelligent devices.
But the most obvious AI names may not be the only companies positioned to benefit.
MarketBeat’s free 10 Best AI Stocks to Own in 2026 report identifies ten publicly traded companies helping power the next phase of the AI buildout. Some are established leaders. Others occupy less obvious corners of the expanding AI ecosystem.
This free report names 10 stocks positioned to ride that wave before the rest of the market catches on.
TODAY AI BRIEF
3 things that happened while you were busy
1 A 19-year-old's screenless AI computer sells out its first batch in hours.
Ghost, a startup backed by Andreessen Horowitz, unveiled Core, a $3,499 box with no screen that runs AI models on your desk around the clock instead of in someone else's cloud. Ghost says your data is encrypted so even the company cannot read it, and you can load any open model from Hugging Face. The pitch is a private alternative to the Mac Mini, and the first batch was gone within hours. Reserve a spot for the next one.
2 Google Docs finally speaks Markdown, the plain text format AI tools love.
Docs now opens, edits and previews .md files natively for every Workspace customer and personal Google account, with comments and collaboration intact and no conversion step. Markdown is the format most AI coding agents write in, which is why one former CTO called it a long overdue win. Read Google's announcement.
3 Cursor lets you redirect an AI agent mid-task without stopping it.
Cursor's latest SDK update adds a steer command, so you can drop a note to a working agent and it changes course without losing its place. Helper agents now run in the background and report back, and every tool can be marked read only or destructive so the risky ones get extra care. See the full changelog.
Bonus reads: Andrej Karpathy says custom AI explainer videos will change education, and a developer proved the point with a video on how Shazam works, plus a plugin that lets Claude Code configure itself by scanning your project and suggesting the right setup.
AI FORWORD
The software factory has arrived, and the humans only show up twice
The assembly line. Developer Ben Holmes has laid out how code at Warp travels from a Slack message to production with AI agents doing most of the handling. A request comes in, one agent decides whether to build it or ask for details, another drafts a plan, a third writes the code, a fourth tests it end to end, and a review agent argues with the builder until the change is clean.
The two checkpoints. People still appear at exactly two moments. A human approves the plan before any code is written, and a human presses ship at the end. Everything in between runs on its own, and a monitoring step watches production for alerts and opens new tickets when something breaks, which feed straight back into the queue.
The price tag. This is the number that matters: Warp says its internal cost per pull request, the unit of a finished code change, fell from $80 to $30. That is not a research demo. The company has published starter templates and a configuration guide so other teams can copy the setup.
The wider pattern. Vercel CEO Guillermo Rauch describes the same shift in a new talk on building around cloud agents and faster feedback loops, and he shipped a small library that catches permission mistakes before code ever runs, with an agent skill built in. When two companies this different converge on the same factory shape in the same week, it is a pattern, not a stunt.
The reframe. If a code change costs $30 and ships in hours, the scarce resource is no longer engineering time. It is good judgment about what to build, which is the one job the factory still hands to a person. That applies well beyond software: the same intake, triage, draft, verify and review loop is coming for marketing, support and operations, and the people who thrive will be the ones who get good at the two checkpoints.
PRESENTED BY :
Hire anyone, anywhere — compliant in under 3 days
Found the right hire, but no entity in their country? Remote becomes the legal employer — with contracts, benefits, and tax setup handled, plus direct access to the same in-house team that runs payroll locally.
SOCIAL SNAPSHOT
What people are actually watching and sharing
Secrecy is dead. Open source pioneer Eric Raymond argues that software secrecy is nearly over now that AI can reconstruct almost anything, and names the one kind of software that can still keep a secret (7,400 likes).
Plans you can read. Claude Code engineer Thariq Shihipar built a skill that turns an agent's plan into a clean HTML page you can skim before saying yes (3,600 bookmarks).
Pocket GPU. An open source tool runs a 27 billion parameter model 40% faster by borrowing the chip in an iPhone over a USB-C cable (2,400 bookmarks).
Personal tutor. A SpaceXAI engineer known for roughly 2,500 pull requests a month added a skill trained on her own writing that answers questions about her workflow (2,300 likes).
Vibe manufacturing. A Warp product designer used Astra to build a physical answering machine for his family, hardware included (1,600 bookmarks).
Four tests. Anthropic engineer Addy Osmani says sloppy AI output has one fixable cause and shares four tests that make an agent verify its own work before handing it over (1,300 bookmarks).
PROMPT STATION
Make any AI check its own work before you see it
Warp's factory has a dedicated verify step, and Addy Osmani's four tests exist for the same reason: an AI that reviews its own output catches most of its own mistakes. This prompt adds that step to anything you ask Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini to produce, from a client email to a pricing spreadsheet. Paste it after your normal request and read the verified version instead of the first draft.
Before you show me the final answer, run a verification pass on your own draft of [THE TASK YOU ASKED FOR].
Check four things: 1) every fact, number and name is correct and you can say where it came from; 2) the output does exactly what I asked and nothing I did not ask for; 3) a careful [TYPE OF READER] would find nothing confusing, missing or inconsistent; 4) nothing in it would embarrass me if forwarded.
List each problem you found and what you changed, in a short section called VERIFICATION, then give me the corrected final version below it. If you found nothing, say so in one line and explain how you checked.